p.guptapost
06-04 02:00 PM
anyone???
can we check the status of EAD application without receipt number?
can we check the status of EAD application without receipt number?
wallpaper girlfriend Billy the Kid is
saileshdude
04-08 03:30 PM
EB1 spillover may never come for some time in the future. The Indian IT companies are applying under EB1 for their PMs and Senior PMs (req: BS in any discipline + 6-7 yrs exp), labeling them as multi-national executives. They are also making the employee pay for the 140 and 485 so that the financial impact is reduced a lot by a potential rejection of the 140.
This is as much BS as labor sub. I think everybody here knows how tough it is to get EB1 classification for researchers. But what scrutiny is there for these "multi-national executives" ? All they have to do is spend some time in India or any other country as a PM or SPM, come to the US on H1B and promptly apply under EB1. :mad:
You nailed it. This is the other form of labor substitution loophole the indian IT companies are using. Even I have started to hear quite a few cases now that indian IT PM or manager are being labelled as multi-national executives. If this is not stopped then any relief from spillover, you can just forget about it. I have heard lot of cases now like this and we need to do something about it. Only genuine candidates should be able to apply in this category.
This is as much BS as labor sub. I think everybody here knows how tough it is to get EB1 classification for researchers. But what scrutiny is there for these "multi-national executives" ? All they have to do is spend some time in India or any other country as a PM or SPM, come to the US on H1B and promptly apply under EB1. :mad:
You nailed it. This is the other form of labor substitution loophole the indian IT companies are using. Even I have started to hear quite a few cases now that indian IT PM or manager are being labelled as multi-national executives. If this is not stopped then any relief from spillover, you can just forget about it. I have heard lot of cases now like this and we need to do something about it. Only genuine candidates should be able to apply in this category.
guyfromsg
09-19 07:25 PM
I arrived on Monday morning and met Paskal as he was going for meeting. Went to situation room and first met ever energetic gcs999. We went out for lunch with logiclife. And then start meeting people and I'll list them separately. Two of the most memorable days in my life. Thank you guys and gals.
Please PM me if you want any specific photos from dinner meet and rally. I took several photos and already shared in one of the threads here.
Please PM me if you want any specific photos from dinner meet and rally. I took several photos and already shared in one of the threads here.
2011 The legend of Billy the Kid
PlainSpeak
01-13 03:05 PM
1) I have read some of your earlier posts on this thread and what you have primarily done is merely re-iterated what the issue is. Without any contribution or suggestion as to how to actually resolve it. And since the situation has continued to stay the same for several years due to Congressional indifference, you seem to have decided to pick on IV for all the faults with EB3 backlogs and the lack of effort therein to resolve the same. For a minute, please understand that we all know the facts and realize what plagues EB3 backlogs.
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
Thank you for the inputs.
1) I have read some of your earlier posts on this thread and what you have primarily done is merely re-iterated what the issue is. Without any contribution or suggestion as to how to actually resolve it. And since the situation has continued to stay the same for several years due to Congressional indifference, you seem to have decided to pick on IV for all the faults with EB3 backlogs and the lack of effort therein to resolve the same. For a minute, please understand that we all know the facts and realize what plagues EB3 backlogs.
That is because no idea we have currently works sor the situation. The only way is to think outside the box. Ok so i came up with an outside the box idea. Maybe it is a good idea maybe it is a bad idea but i did.
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
The idea is that EB2 had benefited to a certain amount because of the change in spill over rule which is good for them i am all gung ho for them. Now since EB2 is in a postion where it will move ahead (fast or slow but it will move) IV focus will have to move towards the other category they claim to represent.
Why is doing something specific for EB3 (even with a chance of failure) NOT and option in IV. In DV bill if IV makes a stand that the 55 k visas should go to oldest priority first that is a chance to wards helping EB retrogressed applicants (Both EB3 and EB2). IV does not even need to make a stand now since it is too early. Has IV even considered it?
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
What failure are you talking about. IV is a success only problem is the success has been to a small group out of the complete EB community. What vitriol are you talking about. All that vitriol came from you guys on IV forum. I am not blaming anyone for not participating in this effort. If the idea has strength people will do that on their own. If not it will die a natural death. Please remember that my Post named (Perhaps it is time to realise a few facts.. ) initially listed the idead and the rest of my posts were spent trying to reply back to every vitriolic attach on the same post. And what did the post say. It said think outside the box
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
No i do not want to represent you (An EB3). I am not even advocating myself as EB3 representative and ofcourse to the rejoinder (which you are doing whether you believe it or not) i say come on guys if according to you i am a lazy good for nothing person who never donated and never participated (My choice but i wil let it slide to make a point) to IV and never worked on anything constructive why teh hell would i want to suddenly become a representative of all EB3 (Shudder!!!!!). Will it not collide with my lazyness and selfishness.
I did not create any negetive vibes. All i said is it is time to consider piece meal (Is this not the same thing that IV advocates to lawmakers)
As far as showing something down your throat who is doing that? I stated a out of box idea and i have spent the whole day today defending it (Its a wonder how me and you all get our work done huh :P). In fact if anything i have spent the whole day removing all the comments and abuses from you guys from down MY throat
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
I have no comments either ways because that is just changing the outer covering. The insides is still the same and it still needs some fresh approach to get out of the problem of retrogression
BTW - When i reply back to messages i do not even see the EB3 and eb2 calssification. Thsi is beacuse the messaage itself tells me what category you are. I must rephrase that... I do see the classification when i am providing advise to people becasue you do not want to gove a wrong advise to anyone right !!!
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
Thank you for the inputs.
1) I have read some of your earlier posts on this thread and what you have primarily done is merely re-iterated what the issue is. Without any contribution or suggestion as to how to actually resolve it. And since the situation has continued to stay the same for several years due to Congressional indifference, you seem to have decided to pick on IV for all the faults with EB3 backlogs and the lack of effort therein to resolve the same. For a minute, please understand that we all know the facts and realize what plagues EB3 backlogs.
That is because no idea we have currently works sor the situation. The only way is to think outside the box. Ok so i came up with an outside the box idea. Maybe it is a good idea maybe it is a bad idea but i did.
2)Yes I have been on every EB3 prediction thread and know the numbers are too bad to be resolved by anything other than CIR (dead) or standalone bills. I do not know why you are stuck on insisting that we all think EB2 becoming current is the only solace for EB3 (associated spillovers etc etc.). IF Eb2 I gets current - well and good - Eb3 will still need some legislative relief (here I go again with EB2 vs EB3 - something I hate to do). But then one of your original gripes seemed to be blaming IV for not considering EB3 provisions in this Diversity Visa Bill which, at this early stage, is completely befuddling!
The idea is that EB2 had benefited to a certain amount because of the change in spill over rule which is good for them i am all gung ho for them. Now since EB2 is in a postion where it will move ahead (fast or slow but it will move) IV focus will have to move towards the other category they claim to represent.
Why is doing something specific for EB3 (even with a chance of failure) NOT and option in IV. In DV bill if IV makes a stand that the 55 k visas should go to oldest priority first that is a chance to wards helping EB retrogressed applicants (Both EB3 and EB2). IV does not even need to make a stand now since it is too early. Has IV even considered it?
3) Your entire approach of going after EB2 applicants and blaming them for your dreamt up failure of IV is insane. Diluting the discussion with vitriol and then blaming everyone around you for not participating makes you a bigger "bigot" (sorry - just paraphrasing one of your used words) than what you blame others to be.
What failure are you talking about. IV is a success only problem is the success has been to a small group out of the complete EB community. What vitriol are you talking about. All that vitriol came from you guys on IV forum. I am not blaming anyone for not participating in this effort. If the idea has strength people will do that on their own. If not it will die a natural death. Please remember that my Post named (Perhaps it is time to realise a few facts.. ) initially listed the idead and the rest of my posts were spent trying to reply back to every vitriolic attach on the same post. And what did the post say. It said think outside the box
4) You do not represent my opinions. So please stop advocating yourself as an EB3 representative (which you are doing whether you believe it or not). With the points you have raised and the negative vibes you have created between EB2 vs EB3, you have shown that you are concerned and frustrated only about your own personal GC situation and are trying to use the EB3 tag to shove it down my throat. Which I completely detest.
No i do not want to represent you (An EB3). I am not even advocating myself as EB3 representative and ofcourse to the rejoinder (which you are doing whether you believe it or not) i say come on guys if according to you i am a lazy good for nothing person who never donated and never participated (My choice but i wil let it slide to make a point) to IV and never worked on anything constructive why teh hell would i want to suddenly become a representative of all EB3 (Shudder!!!!!). Will it not collide with my lazyness and selfishness.
I did not create any negetive vibes. All i said is it is time to consider piece meal (Is this not the same thing that IV advocates to lawmakers)
As far as showing something down your throat who is doing that? I stated a out of box idea and i have spent the whole day today defending it (Its a wonder how me and you all get our work done huh :P). In fact if anything i have spent the whole day removing all the comments and abuses from you guys from down MY throat
5)I think IV should remove the EB classification that shows up with people's profiles. I do not wish to be "branded" even before joining in a discussion.
I have no comments either ways because that is just changing the outer covering. The insides is still the same and it still needs some fresh approach to get out of the problem of retrogression
BTW - When i reply back to messages i do not even see the EB3 and eb2 calssification. Thsi is beacuse the messaage itself tells me what category you are. I must rephrase that... I do see the classification when i am providing advise to people becasue you do not want to gove a wrong advise to anyone right !!!
more...
roseball
09-01 09:45 PM
Thanks. So i shouldnt re-enter even if i have the physical card with me?
If you have the card with you, then you should just use it to re-enter. Use AP if you don't have the card with you.
If you have the card with you, then you should just use it to re-enter. Use AP if you don't have the card with you.
amitjoey
01-18 04:10 PM
We appreciate all the one time contributions also, we are counting all the recurring contributing members. Right now we need 885 more.
more...
radhagd
05-15 09:46 AM
you can apply EAD,AP,485 together
2010 2010 illy the kid dead. illy
santb1975
04-17 05:36 PM
We do
That is great news!! I am excited to hear that we will be getting the support of NorCal Members.
Team IV has reached a membership of 27 members as of today. I have several more to confirm by this weekend.
That is nearly $9000 in fundraising efforts that we can target! $9000 may not be much, but it can be put to good use for lobbying of new bills, especially the three new bills introduced recently for highly skilled legal immigrants pending GCs.
Go Team IV
That is great news!! I am excited to hear that we will be getting the support of NorCal Members.
Team IV has reached a membership of 27 members as of today. I have several more to confirm by this weekend.
That is nearly $9000 in fundraising efforts that we can target! $9000 may not be much, but it can be put to good use for lobbying of new bills, especially the three new bills introduced recently for highly skilled legal immigrants pending GCs.
Go Team IV
more...
mjadala
05-20 10:11 PM
called all of the offices.
hair pictures illy the kid death.
sam2006
02-02 05:56 PM
its just a message from Hammond LCC )mostly deal with for Schedule A visas
http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/
http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/
more...
immigration1234
05-03 03:34 PM
Congratulations!!!
hot Billy the Kid#39;s death
illusions
03-27 12:55 PM
having PD current and Processing time current does not mean that the applicant will get GC. the state department actually moves cutoff dates in the VB because USCIS is not productive enough (not processing applications on time) to use up all the available visas for that quarter or year and they are afraid that those visas will go to waste. so they move the cutoff date on the VB (make more people current) so Consular processing will have more applications to pull from and then approve more applications.
so now we have to have PD current processing time for that service center is current and also be lucky so an IO will pick up our application to be processed. (it is actually little depressing)
:( dang.... so it's a chance* that they will pick up my app when it becomes current. So it is very likely that I might see my date get current... be that way for some time and still get no LUD; and even worse see another retrogression on it and wait more for PD to get current.... damn damn :eek:
so now we have to have PD current processing time for that service center is current and also be lucky so an IO will pick up our application to be processed. (it is actually little depressing)
:( dang.... so it's a chance* that they will pick up my app when it becomes current. So it is very likely that I might see my date get current... be that way for some time and still get no LUD; and even worse see another retrogression on it and wait more for PD to get current.... damn damn :eek:
more...
house 2011 tattoo The Death of Billy
shantak
08-11 09:36 AM
CNAG, i hope the renewals also get processed faster.
Folks, any updates on anyone's case.
GO IV GO.
Nothing on mine, Im still waiting
eFiled: May 23rd
Folks, any updates on anyone's case.
GO IV GO.
Nothing on mine, Im still waiting
eFiled: May 23rd
tattoo Billy-the-kid-614x442
zephyrr
07-19 01:03 AM
i am happy for those who can file now.
my pd is jul 2003 and was lucky enough that my case got approved in time that i could file.
we should have really started putting pressure that the becs at least approve cases by priority dates if nothing else. the becs didn't follow any rules and approved cases out of order as well.
lesson learnt. complaceny doesn't work, be engaged, contribute, and fight for your rights.
Years we have been told priority date establishes your place in the queue.
We have spurned job offers and declined the new PERM process to hold on to the priority dates.
Many are still awaiting labor certifications from the backlog elimination centers. Out comes USCIS and says everyone with a LC can file I140 & I485.
People still waiting for LC with priority dates in 2003-2004 are seeing applicants who have priority dates as late as 2007 but with approved LCs through PERM walk through to I485.
Net result, USCIS is going to be flooded with applicants enough to retrogress the priority dates 3-4 years back as early as september. (Everybody with a LC will be able to file for I485 in July). So applicants with priority dates of 2007 are going to get EAD and GC, while LC backlogged 2003 applicants to have to wait for another 3-4 years before they can even file I485.
Aint fair. Aint fair at all. How can this be. How can rules be changed in the middle of the game.
my pd is jul 2003 and was lucky enough that my case got approved in time that i could file.
we should have really started putting pressure that the becs at least approve cases by priority dates if nothing else. the becs didn't follow any rules and approved cases out of order as well.
lesson learnt. complaceny doesn't work, be engaged, contribute, and fight for your rights.
Years we have been told priority date establishes your place in the queue.
We have spurned job offers and declined the new PERM process to hold on to the priority dates.
Many are still awaiting labor certifications from the backlog elimination centers. Out comes USCIS and says everyone with a LC can file I140 & I485.
People still waiting for LC with priority dates in 2003-2004 are seeing applicants who have priority dates as late as 2007 but with approved LCs through PERM walk through to I485.
Net result, USCIS is going to be flooded with applicants enough to retrogress the priority dates 3-4 years back as early as september. (Everybody with a LC will be able to file for I485 in July). So applicants with priority dates of 2007 are going to get EAD and GC, while LC backlogged 2003 applicants to have to wait for another 3-4 years before they can even file I485.
Aint fair. Aint fair at all. How can this be. How can rules be changed in the middle of the game.
more...
pictures illy the kid death. wallpaper
pappusheth
08-17 10:34 PM
my wife filed on may 29th, soft lud on june 6th and fp done on june 21st. no updates/luds after the one on june 6th.
my wife called them last friday and opened a SR.. we'll see if that helps.. i think we will go ahead and schedule infopass as well..
dunno what's going on..
my wife called them last friday and opened a SR.. we'll see if that helps.. i think we will go ahead and schedule infopass as well..
dunno what's going on..
dresses illy the kid death picture.
sravani
05-15 10:53 AM
Hello friends,
My birth certificate has the following information
date of birth, Mothers name, fathers name, place of birth. It does not have my name and i am from India. Is it ok.. or should i get one with name.
My PD is not current but i am getting ready with all the documents, just in case it gets current.
If the certificate doesn't have your name, how will they know it's your birth certificate? :confused:
I don't think birth certificate without your name is acceptable by USCIS
My birth certificate has the following information
date of birth, Mothers name, fathers name, place of birth. It does not have my name and i am from India. Is it ok.. or should i get one with name.
My PD is not current but i am getting ready with all the documents, just in case it gets current.
If the certificate doesn't have your name, how will they know it's your birth certificate? :confused:
I don't think birth certificate without your name is acceptable by USCIS
more...
makeup illy the kid death photo. his
Saralayar
04-10 01:33 PM
This is a thread that has no relevance to IV or the community that is suffering from retrogression, especially if you are a EB candidate from India & China. We need some energy devoted to the following:
1. Multi year EAD/AP
2. Recapture wasted visa numbers
3. Eliminate counting dependents on the Adjustment application from numerical limitations
4. Do away with country limits
If we can hit the target with even ONE of the demands above we have a won a battle with the larger war on looming in on us and that is successfully surviving the GC tumultuous journey.
Every discussion on the forum should concentrate on solving one of the issues above and the concept of citizenship after 5/10/15 is total nonsense.
There is no harm in adding this also as the fifth item along with the existing 4 items. :D
1. Multi year EAD/AP
2. Recapture wasted visa numbers
3. Eliminate counting dependents on the Adjustment application from numerical limitations
4. Do away with country limits
If we can hit the target with even ONE of the demands above we have a won a battle with the larger war on looming in on us and that is successfully surviving the GC tumultuous journey.
Every discussion on the forum should concentrate on solving one of the issues above and the concept of citizenship after 5/10/15 is total nonsense.
There is no harm in adding this also as the fifth item along with the existing 4 items. :D
girlfriend Death of Billy The Kid
immigc06
06-02 02:06 PM
HI speddi, Can you share the number you have called for the status. I need to call them as well.
Thanks.
Thanks.
hairstyles illy the kid death photo.
preetianu
02-01 09:21 PM
This is our state
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~pmeerw/BG/Cedar_Point/pictures/The_Mantis_roller_coaster_in_Cedar_Point.jpg
360 view.
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~pmeerw/BG/Cedar_Point/pictures/The_Mantis_roller_coaster_in_Cedar_Point.jpg
360 view.
Humhongekamyab
08-04 02:18 PM
after a long time waiting I-485 got approved on 8/3/10 from NSC.
good luck to everyone :)
Congrats! Did you do anything special like SR, Infopass, etc.?
good luck to everyone :)
Congrats! Did you do anything special like SR, Infopass, etc.?
sravani
05-15 01:24 PM
Good question. My 485 is filed few weeks ago and I would like to know the answer as well, can some one help?
No comments:
Post a Comment