jcrajput
10-03 08:49 AM
I am starting new thread for people who are re-filing their applications (I-485) because they were rejected for any reasons.
Please list following:
1. Rejection notice date (RND)
2. Reejction reason(s)
3. Whose fault
4. Status of re-filing
5. Date of package recevied at service center (date, time, received by, service center)
6. Status
7. Waiting for action from
I-485 Rejected/RND:09-21/I-140 Not Found/USCIS error/Re-file date:TBD/Recevied By: TBD/Status:PENDING/Waiting for: Lawyer to re-submit.
Please list following:
1. Rejection notice date (RND)
2. Reejction reason(s)
3. Whose fault
4. Status of re-filing
5. Date of package recevied at service center (date, time, received by, service center)
6. Status
7. Waiting for action from
I-485 Rejected/RND:09-21/I-140 Not Found/USCIS error/Re-file date:TBD/Recevied By: TBD/Status:PENDING/Waiting for: Lawyer to re-submit.
wallpaper Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
Becks
01-25 03:44 PM
You cannot travel and enter US with expired AP. Please renew your AP. Stamp on AP cannot make any difference as per my knowledge. You will have your I-94 also with same time stamp.
Hi All
My AP document expired in NOv 2008. I traveled to India and got back in Aug 2008. The officer stamped the document and wrote paroled until Aug 2009.
Can I travel on this document?
Please advise.
Thank you.
Hi All
My AP document expired in NOv 2008. I traveled to India and got back in Aug 2008. The officer stamped the document and wrote paroled until Aug 2009.
Can I travel on this document?
Please advise.
Thank you.
gapala
06-03 08:31 PM
http://adoption.state.gov/country/india.html
.
This is going to help many.. thanks
.
This is going to help many.. thanks
2011 Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber
stefanusc
03-13 01:21 PM
Hi to all,
I met with a potential client who is an illegal immigrant living in the US. She has a child who is a US citizen. The father was voluntarily deported and the mother gave him permission to take the child back to their home country to visit the grandparents. The father was supposed to make sure the child returned to the US within 3 months. It has been 6 months. If my client files an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, will the US Government begin deportation proceedings?
I met with a potential client who is an illegal immigrant living in the US. She has a child who is a US citizen. The father was voluntarily deported and the mother gave him permission to take the child back to their home country to visit the grandparents. The father was supposed to make sure the child returned to the US within 3 months. It has been 6 months. If my client files an application under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, will the US Government begin deportation proceedings?
more...
theOne
09-22 12:12 AM
I recently got my gc. Is there anything I need to do to initiate my Citizenship process ?
Thanks,
theOne
Thanks,
theOne
martinvisalaw
09-10 12:52 PM
The withdrawal of the H-1B is not really what decides whether you are out of status. Presumably the former employer withdrew because you no longer work there. In that case, you have been out of status since you came off payroll.
However, if there is only a short gap between your last paystub and when the new company files the H-1B, you could still be approved for a change of employer and extension. You should discuss with the lawyer preparing the new H-1B.
You should not be subject to the cap in any case, since you were already counted towards the cap within the past 6 years.
However, if there is only a short gap between your last paystub and when the new company files the H-1B, you could still be approved for a change of employer and extension. You should discuss with the lawyer preparing the new H-1B.
You should not be subject to the cap in any case, since you were already counted towards the cap within the past 6 years.
more...
ansh78
08-06 08:55 AM
I am in the same boat.
Approved I-140 in EB3 category. Current employer wants to file in EB2 category, they gave me a new job that qualifies for the category but my Attorney says that I have to withdraw my current EB3 application..
I have read so many post here and every where that tells me that it is possible to continue the process but my lawyer says that I need to withdraw EB3 case.... Any one knows good lawyer around DC Metro area with good experience for Eb3 to Eb2 transfer with the same employer
Approved I-140 in EB3 category. Current employer wants to file in EB2 category, they gave me a new job that qualifies for the category but my Attorney says that I have to withdraw my current EB3 application..
I have read so many post here and every where that tells me that it is possible to continue the process but my lawyer says that I need to withdraw EB3 case.... Any one knows good lawyer around DC Metro area with good experience for Eb3 to Eb2 transfer with the same employer
2010 Justin Bieber Photos - Justin
sw33t
08-01 02:31 PM
Come on people. I wont stop bumping this thread until we reach 100.
:)
So sign up!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
:)
So sign up!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
more...
GCisLottery
10-04 12:19 PM
A key figure (http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=hastert&btnG=Search+News) in the latest political drama was a key figure in immigration debate (http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=hastert+immigration&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives). I wish he makes way and hopefully some moderate does something for the immigrant community.
hair Justin Bieber Photos - Justin
mbartosik
03-14 11:28 AM
service requests taking up to 60 days now and processing times 60 days behind published figures.
About 45 days ago I raised a service because my receipt date was more than 60 days older than the Nebraska service center processing date. At 30 days after raising the service request I called and asked what's happening, they said wait until 45 days, at 45 days I called and asked what's happening, they said wait until 60 days.
The IO told me that they are way behind with the service requests, and it is taking 45 to 60 days to answer. Indeed they are hardly able to answer service requests.
I also asked her to hazard a guess about when my case (receipt date 4 May 2007 current with VB) might get adjudicated, she said by 30 April - they have a target to clear older petitions by 30 April. She said that they are about 60 days behind their published processing dates.
My reasoning for this -- potentially this is because of EB3 moving forward in the visa bulletin and 180 day name check rule -- it effectively moves the processing dates backwards since they are not pre-adjudicating, but they didn't want to move the reported processing times back.
She was also able to tell me that my name check was passed and confirmed that receipt date is what counts not notice date (unlike IO I previously spoke with). Something I knew but wanted to hear from them too.
So summary:
Service requests -- may take 60+ days to answer (maybe they'll say 90 days when I call at 60 days).
Real processing times are about 60+ days behind published (at least for Nebraska).
Of course since you can raise a service request when receipt date is > 60 days behind processing date, they are encouraging raising of service requests which they are now swamped with.
About 45 days ago I raised a service because my receipt date was more than 60 days older than the Nebraska service center processing date. At 30 days after raising the service request I called and asked what's happening, they said wait until 45 days, at 45 days I called and asked what's happening, they said wait until 60 days.
The IO told me that they are way behind with the service requests, and it is taking 45 to 60 days to answer. Indeed they are hardly able to answer service requests.
I also asked her to hazard a guess about when my case (receipt date 4 May 2007 current with VB) might get adjudicated, she said by 30 April - they have a target to clear older petitions by 30 April. She said that they are about 60 days behind their published processing dates.
My reasoning for this -- potentially this is because of EB3 moving forward in the visa bulletin and 180 day name check rule -- it effectively moves the processing dates backwards since they are not pre-adjudicating, but they didn't want to move the reported processing times back.
She was also able to tell me that my name check was passed and confirmed that receipt date is what counts not notice date (unlike IO I previously spoke with). Something I knew but wanted to hear from them too.
So summary:
Service requests -- may take 60+ days to answer (maybe they'll say 90 days when I call at 60 days).
Real processing times are about 60+ days behind published (at least for Nebraska).
Of course since you can raise a service request when receipt date is > 60 days behind processing date, they are encouraging raising of service requests which they are now swamped with.
more...
gk_2000
05-23 03:27 PM
Just more blah, blah, blah.. BTW who is Doraikumar? Is he from IV? He has been quoted here..
hot hot house Justin Bieber
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:50 AM
As a California immigration lawyer who files many asylum cases, I am used to thinking of a the United States as a place of refuge and to documenting the horrible country conditions of other countries. I have successfully represented applicants for asylum who feared staying in their countries because while serving in their countries' armies, they were harmed on account of their sexual orientation.
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
It is therefore rather surprising to come across a story of a U.S.soldier who is fleeing to Canada (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/11/20/refugee-board-soldier-lesbian.html) because she fears harm in the U.S. Army on account of her sexual orientation. According to CBC news, U.S. Army Pte. Bethany Smith fled Canada in September 2007 from a U.S. Army base in Fort Campbell, Ky. She applied for refugee status in October 2007, saying that she was harassed and threatened by fellow soldiers over her sexual orientation and feared that her life would be in danger if she were deported and returned to the army. The Canadian authorities initially rejected in her claim in February 2009. However, on appeal, the Federal Court of Canada held that the refugee board must reconsider the case again because the Board made several mistakes in initially reviewing her claim.
The Federal Court's decision (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/Smith%20and%20the%20Minister%20of%20Citizenship%20 and%20Immigration.pdf)noted that the refugee board failed to fully consider the evidence pertaining to the situation of gays and lesbians in the U.S. Army to determine whether Pte. Smith could have availed herself of protection in the United States. The Federal Court also noted that the Board failed to determine whether Pte. Smith would be persecuted on account of her social group - as a lesbian in the U.S. Army if forced to return. There were other errors mentioned in the decision.
It is sad that the U.S. policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," is the basis of an asylum claim in Canada. Pt. Smith was only 19 years old when she fled to Canada. From everything I read, it appears that she wanted to serve in the U.S. Army and no real desire to leave the United States. At a time when we apparently need people to serve in the Armed Forces and in fact give non-citizens a way to immigrate to the United States faster for their service, it seems ridiculous that an American citizen should have to leave. It it is time to eliminate the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/11/us_army_soldier_applies_for_as.html)
more...
house justin bieber and selena gomez
cheers1234
06-15 08:22 AM
Sorry for the confusion. i am not deported. One of my company's new employee was deported at POE. Yes. POE did called my employer and asked where he is going to work. My employer said he is going to work on our company site. Then the officer said your empoyee told us that he is going to work at client site. Then the officer said he will call back.
Officer called back after 30min and told my employer that your emplyee submitted some fraud document. And then my employer said i am not liable what he did and explined the officer that he was doing bussinees more than 8 years and have all the proper documents.
Then the officer said he understand the situation and said he is just doing duty. Officer said he is going to send a report to DOL.
Officer called back after 30min and told my employer that your emplyee submitted some fraud document. And then my employer said i am not liable what he did and explined the officer that he was doing bussinees more than 8 years and have all the proper documents.
Then the officer said he understand the situation and said he is just doing duty. Officer said he is going to send a report to DOL.
tattoo justin bieber selena gomez
mn1975
08-19 12:49 PM
thanks for the reply
just one question: Do i need liability insurance if i work for a person who has contract with the client?
just one question: Do i need liability insurance if i work for a person who has contract with the client?
more...
pictures Justin Bieber Selena Gomez
svr_76
12-17 11:40 AM
setup monthly contri for $50...
dresses hair Justin Bieber and Selena
ziggy7bs
03-14 01:20 PM
Have you filed i-140?
more...
makeup justin bieber selena gomez
andr.in
10-09 09:04 AM
omg everything is s coool
girlfriend Justin Bieber And Selena Gomez
Star
06-18 12:02 PM
I am from Hauppauge, NY. I am wiling to dedicate some time to this cause.
hairstyles Justin Bieber Kissing Selena
va_dude
07-20 05:58 PM
First of all you would need a visa to visit UK.
hotscud21
01-08 01:39 PM
can you please let us know your PD?
pou-pou
04-18 11:50 PM
Aww. That first one is a pearl, but that price wrecks it :S
How about some neat pixelfont and just some tiny mark on bottom right or upper left corner. Something that doesn't break that atmosphere. :love:
How about some neat pixelfont and just some tiny mark on bottom right or upper left corner. Something that doesn't break that atmosphere. :love:
No comments:
Post a Comment